Adactio

We show you a CSS property name. You tell us if it’s real or if we made it up. That’s it. It starts easy. It does not stay easy. adactio.com/links/22501

Web development follows a familiar cycle. First we glue together a solution with whatever we have — JavaScript, image hacks, Flash, anything. Then the platform matures, and CSS or HTML eventually makes that same workaround native. Rounded corners, custom fonts, smooth scrolling, sticky positioning: all of these started as JavaScript-heavy hacks before CSS turned them into a single declaration. We are in another one of those transition moments. A new wave of long-requested CSS feature...

I’m slapping my forehead—progressive web components is a perfect name for what I’ve been calling HTML web components. Why didn’t I think of that? A Progressive Web Component is a native Custom Element designed in two layers: a base layer of HTML and CSS that renders immediately, without JavaScript, and an enhancement layer of JavaScript that adds reactivity, event handling, and more advanced templating. adactio.com/links/22491

I can’t remember the last time a blog post resonated with me this much. Craig’s criteria on his job search: One: fuck offices Two: fuck AI Three: fuck React And his conclusion: Fuck work adactio.com/links/22490

This is a guide to how to be a web developer. Really good advice from Laurie. What this site is not is a tutorial. Tutorials are very specific to a time and a technology. This is intended to be a guide to tell you all the things you can learn, so you can then go off and learn them. adactio.com/links/22485

The choice isn’t between books and screens. The choice is between intentional design and profitable chaos. Between habitats that cultivate human potential and platforms that extract human attention. adactio.com/links/22484

Eleven years ago, I wrote: Sometimes I consider the explosive growth of computation and think that strong AI is a near-term inevitability. Then I remember printers. That was just a brainfart, but Robin tackles it seriously in his thoughtful essay. A pleasing image: if indeed AI automation does not flood fill the physical world, it will be because the humble paper jam stood in its way. Software cannot, in fact, eat this world. Software can reflect it; encroach upon it; mor...

I mean, I would ask for the country first (because not all countries have zip/postal codes), but the point stands… adactio.com/links/22475

A lovely post from Remy about State Of The Browser and Web Day Out. adactio.com/links/22474

Related to Matt’s thoughts: …working with agents feels much less like classic deep work, and much more like playing a game. Not to say the work is frivolous—it’s just because it feels like I’m in a game loop. Flow, at least in the usual sense for me, feels smooth and continuous. The work and your attention starts to line up so cleanly that the experience becomes frictionless. You disappear into the work and meld with it. One notable aspect of flow has been I lose track of time. Work...

Most of your screen time isn’t leisure. It isn’t addiction. It isn’t even a choice. It’s maintenance. adactio.com/links/22472

Brian takes us back twenty years (which is when we first met): To gather so many like-minded, energetic people in once place and not have it ruined by corporate greed felt unique. adactio.com/links/22463

Matt has some smart reckons on the relationship between time and technology: The factory bell, the railway timetable, the telegraph wire, the always-on smartphone — each imposed a new temporal discipline, each produced its own characteristic form of exhaustion, and each was eventually (partially, imperfectly) domesticated through a combination of regulation, design, and collective action. adactio.com/links/22462