1 hour ago · Culture · 0 comments

Fortune just reported that the US alone has 1,200 AI bills and no good test for any of them, because “in the past nine months, the United States has produced more AI legislation than in the prior decade, [that faces] three different [and partly contrasting] theories of what AI policy is supposed to do”.The lack of clarity coming from that proliferation of rules, said IBM Chairman and CEO Arvind Krishna, will be the “central question facing AI policy”, because:“The balance between too many regulations, it’s terrible; too few, we may not love the outcome, so we got to find the Goldilocks middle.”Whatever it is, that Goldilocks middle must work both inside the US and abroad, because if the international regulatory landscape turns into a bloated bureaucracy, “that would not be so good for us to win the AI race.”Is that really the problem, or something else? Never mindOf course, all those concerns come from one explicit pretension and constitute one implicit, but desperate request: the…

No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.