The pattern we need to compost – You write something rooted in years of experience and practical work, you try to make it accessible. Someone responds immediately with an objection that shows they haven’t read let alone followed the argument yet. Or they react to the tone, the hashtag, or one phrase instead of engaging with the substance. Sometimes the response is sincere but rushed, sometimes it’s performative, often it’s shaped by the habits we’ve absorbed from #dotcons culture, where speed of reaction is rewarded more than depth of thought. And then comes the difficult choice: do you explain everything again? do you spend energy untangling misunderstandings? or do you move on because there’s already too much real work waiting? This is not about wanting agreement or avoiding criticism, good disagreement is useful, serious challenge helps sharpen ideas. What becomes exhausting is the absence of engagement underneath the reaction. So why this matter? This goes beyond personal burnout,…
No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.