About the "putting money back in people's pockets" catchphrase

This title makes a statement: the idea between speech marks is a catchphrase. If it is really a catchphrase it must have a target audience. If there's an audience, this audience is the people who feel in a precarious financial situation, but not precarious enough to have abandoned the idea that financial security is what will definitely ease their fears and make their life much better. In other words, I'm talking about people who feel they can juggle to make ends meet, or could make ends meet and have not yet made fundamental changes in their beliefs regarding the paycheque loop, or feel that their disposable income doesn't grow at least as fast as their cost of living. If it is a catchphrase, the substance has to be somewhat flawed. What could be wrong with "putting back money in people's pockets"? At first sight nothing is wrong: no-one will complain about allowing more people to spend more, even if it is only until the next Xmas and by Xmas I mean all the end-of-year and new-tear…

Commenting on Bubbles has been removed. Why? If you want to talk about this post, write to the author, use the comments on their blog if it has them, or reply with a "RE:" post on your own blog. Suggestions? feedback@bubbles.town