1 hour ago · Culture · hide

It’s been a long week. I feel like the public knows a lot more about a CEO’s sex life than we all needed to know, don’t you? I know that sex is a juicy topic for gossip, but I think nearly everyone is focused on the wrong thing here. People have called the woman from the first-revealed affair a “honeypot,” and him a sucker for falling for it. Though the spy narrative so far holds no water, everyone has been incredibly naive to think they would somehow not be susceptible to emotional manipulation in a spy situation. This is not really about sex. It’s about trust between people. All of this is entirely about what else may have happened. Did Jensen Huang reveal confidential information? Did he do anything illegal? Did he abuse his power? None of the sex matters. If it does to you, that’s a moral conundrum for you to work out for yourself. Neither does it matter how many people he had relationships with. If all of it was consensual, the amount involved is irrelevant. And the only person…

Commenting on Bubbles has been removed. Why? If you want to talk about this post, write to the author, use the comments on their blog if it has them, or reply with a "RE:" post on your own blog. Suggestions? feedback@bubbles.town