Inversion in an ellipse

The previous three post have been part of a series on geometric duality. The traditional but somewhat mysterious terminology is the pole of a line and the polar of a point. As explained here, the terminology was first coined in the context of spherical geometry where the term “pole” makes sense. It was then extended to the plane where the meaning is less obvious. The use of poles and polars is that they preserve certain geometric information, and so they can transform one problem into a dual problem. This was illustrated in the first post in the series. Equations in spherical trigonometry have a buy-one-get-one-free property: applying an identity to the dual of a triangle gives another identity. This post discussed how to define the pole of a line and the polar of a point with respect to a circle in the plane. The post stated that more generally you can do this in the projective plane. Since there’s no difference between conic sections in the projective plane, anything you can do for…