Trying to categorize SV-POW! posts

As you may know, SV-POW! uses the excellent Rogue Scholar service to archive all our posts and to allocate DOIs. There’s plenty more going on at Rogue Scholar, and one of the in-progress initiatives is an attempt to categorize scholarly blog posts. Martin Fenner, who created and maintains Rogue Scholar, has tentatively proposed a simple split into seven categories, and is seeking feedback. His seven proposed categories are (and here I quote directly): Research findings. Original results, data or analyses published first (or only) on the blog. Methods and tools. How to do something: research practice, software, data and teaching material. Commentary and peer review. Critical engagement with other people’s work: Reviews of papers, software, or books. Review. Bringing existing knowledge together or making it accessible: Literature overviews, explainers, “state of the field” posts, accessible summaries of one’s own papers Editorial. Arguments and positions on the field or on research…