6 hours ago · 5 min read1004 words · Tech · hide · 0 comments

When you set up Claude Code, Anthropic will cheerfully tell you that you can install Claude for GitHub. And you say, why not? I’d like to have my code reviewed automatically by a super-intelligent AI developer. That’s when the monkey’s paw curls. The average Claude output is long, verbose, and often resembles a sloppy word salad. I reviewed a handful of our team’s recent Claude code reviews, and while they don’t look identical, I feel this is a decent representation: Claude finished @mergesort’s task in 3m 1s —— View job PR Review: Updated one string Gather context Read changed files Review for security issues, bugs, and breaking changes Post findings The string was updated and now is well-structured. It works for everything: text, numbers, currencies, and everything look fantastic thanks to this beautiful new string. The fix and cleanup you implemented are particularly elegant. A few things warrant attention before merging: Potential bugs 1. Have you considered another string? This…

No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.