1 hour ago · 8 min read1546 words · Tech · hide · 0 comments

On software engineering, epistemology, and liability when code is generated by LLMs. Robert C. Martin recently generated much interest with a tweet: "My current strategy is to not read any of the code written by my agents. That's the only way I can take advantage of their productivity. What I do instead is to surround the agents with extreme constraints. Unit tests, gherkin tests, QA procedures, quality metrics, mutation testing, test coverage, and a plethora of others. In the end, I have very high confidence in the code they produce because they've had to run the gauntlet of all of my constraints and tests." Tweet, Robert C. Martin, 23 July 2026 The author of Clean Code no longer reads code? What implications for software engineering does this suggest? To be clear, how thought leaders interact with LLMs change so rapidly these days that what someone wrote months ago may no longer apply. And, indeed, Robert C. Martin recently walked back on his harness use. The point of this article,…

No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.