The Jilin Judgment (Case C‑249/25): Can Member States Suspend Asylum Procedures During Temporary Protection, and for How Long? 0 ▲ EU Law Analysis 1 hour ago · 13 min read2578 words · Politics · hide · 0 comments Dr Meltem Ineli Ciger, Associate Professor of International Law, Süleyman Demirel University Photo credit: Maksym Kozlenko, via Wikimedia Commons On 1 October 2026, the Court of Justice delivered Case C‑249/25 (Jilin), its fourth preliminary ruling on the Council Directive 2001/55/EC (Temporary Protection Directive, ‘TPD’) since the Directive was activated for people displaced from Ukraine. It follows Joined Cases C‑244/24 and C‑290/24 Kaduna (19 December 2024), Case C‑753/23 Krasiliva (27 February 2025) and Case C‑195/25 Framholm (20 November 2025), all discussed on this blog (here, here and here). The question in Jilin is: can a Member State suspend processing of applications for international protection of temporary protection beneficiaries until temporary protection ends? The Court’s answer is no, subject to an exception for cases of ‘objective impossibility’. This post summarises the judgment and then examines what the Court left undefined. It criticises the absence of any… No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.