46 minutes ago · 8 min read1566 words · Writing · hide · 0 comments

The blatant and conspicuous use of AI images on the website meant I didn’t have to ask an LLM to assess the likelihood that these articles were written by (or significantly generated by) an AI tool, though I did anyway. That analysis actually called out a pretty astute point: The most probative clue is the site-wide convergence of form and voice across nominally different writers, not em-dashes, vocabulary, sentence length, or any AI detector score. A human editor imposing a very rigid house template could produce the same phenomenon, but generative AI is a substantially simpler explanation for the combination of volume + structural repetition + uniform joke mechanics + synthetic specificity + multiple apparently distinct bylines producing nearly interchangeable textual architecture. That has been my take on AI generated text, images, audio, and video for some time now: It’s impressive at first blush, but the moment you start to look deeper, it underwhelms. That happened here, too. I…

No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.