58 days ago · Tech · hide · Fediverse post

I have a lot of conversations about the fine details of software process, because the software that I work on, is a lot like Pivotal Tracker in some ways and very different in others, and we're very deliberate about those differences. For instance: Points. We don't have them. We do all our velocity calculations and predictions with raw story counting. If we're going to add them, I want to be able to articulate very clearly why. So I talking with people a lot about why we haven't added them yet, and about what the point of pointing us.Should we point? Why do we point? What does a point mean? Should we use Fibonacci or a powers of two or a linear scale or t-shirt sizes? Should we top out at 3 or 5 or 8 or 30 or 100? (If you top out at anything above 8 you are wrong.) Is pointing about the points or is it "about the conversation?" Are points really risk & complexity, or are they actually just time?And on and on and on and on.This kind of conversation is fun but I increasingly think that…

Commenting on Bubbles has been removed. Why? If you want to talk about this post, write to the author, use the comments on their blog if it has them, or reply with a "RE:" post on your own blog. Suggestions? feedback@bubbles.town