1 hour ago · 9 min read1719 words · Culture · hide · 0 comments

Every organization has at least one requirement that has been discussed more times than it has been implemented. It has a document. The document has version history. The version history has moods. Reasonable, well-paid adults have gathered around this requirement on four separate occasions, produced diagrams of increasing beauty, and left the room with less clarity than they arrived with, which is an impressive trick when you consider that they were all trying to help. The usual explanation is that the requirement is unclear. It isn't. The usual remedy is more precision. It won't work. You can define the term nine ways, benchmark all three options, and produce a decision matrix so thorough it qualifies as a minor academic contribution, and the argument will still be waiting for you on Monday, well rested and slightly better dressed. That is because the argument was never about the requirement. It was about who gets to decide, conducted in technical language, because technical language…

No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.