I don't think we are ready to NOT read the output

I don’t think we are ready to NOT read the output I read the code for things that are important. Personal projects, non-critical, funsies - sure I’ll allow it through and take the output at face value. But for real work - I just can’t see it. I think 20-40% of the code needs to reworked, always, from agents. Common issues: Not reuses; duplicating Atrocious comments (this is a Claude problem mostly) Over testing Stupid function/method names Security holes (paradoxically very good at security at the same time?) In SQL apps, looooves a migration. Like will generate 5 migrations in a single session instead of 1 migration file with everything in it Not afraid of throwing in some N+1’s too That said, they’re still a game changing and I don’t think we should go back to “hand-coding”. But they are not ready for blind trust. Trust, but verify Tags: #ai

Commenting on Bubbles has been removed. Why? If you want to talk about this post, write to the author, use the comments on their blog if it has them, or reply with a "RE:" post on your own blog. Suggestions? feedback@bubbles.town