16 days ago · Tech · hide · 0 comments

AI can make sermon research feel faster. It can also make an unsupported claim look finished. That tradeoff matters to me as both a pastor and a builder. When I use AI around sermon preparation, I do not want a confident paragraph that leaves me wondering where the idea came from. I want a trail back to the biblical text, my own notes, and any source the tool used. If I cannot inspect the trail, I should not carry the claim into the pulpit. Fluency is not evidenceA polished answer can hide weak interpretation. It may flatten two commentators into one generic position, invent a quotation, or move too quickly from observation to application. The answer is not to reject every AI tool. The answer is to give AI a narrower job. I am comfortable asking it to organize research questions, compare notes I have already gathered, surface tensions I need to examine, or flag claims that still need verification. I am not comfortable treating its fluency as authority. My simple source ruleFor any…

No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.