Nomenclature 0 ▲ notes: posts 8 hours ago · Culture · hide · 0 comments It is frustrating how powerful a good name is, or how destructive a poor name is. A name is that imprecise or distracting can derail what it represents. It is difficult to give a topic the breath it deserves when you are choking on the nomenclature. Evil can be hidden behind a pleasant name, or obscured from criticism by an awkward one. If you are fighting for a cause who's name requires a subtitle to convey its sentiment, you are carrying weight that your opponents likely aren't[^1]. A distracting name will distract from substantive dialogue. It's tempting to fight the minutiae of name and how accurate it is. A poor name guarantees a hurdle every time it is spoken about. Some topics are vague by their very nature, inviting or even incentivising poor names. Every sentence fighting over a name is a wasted opportunity to fight substance. I wonder how many minds would be changed if you took existing ideas and gave them more effective names. Antitrust legislation is one of the most… No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.