1 hour ago · 7 min read1450 words · Tech · hide · 0 comments

A team is in planning. Someone asks for another engineer, another month, or a narrower scope. A few years ago, the useful questions would have been about the problem, the risk, and the cheapest responsible way to reduce it. Now a different question can become the ritual: did you try it with AI first?That question can be healthy. Some engineers still underuse tools that would remove boring work, surface options, or force a sharper explanation of the problem. I do not think engineering leaders are wrong to expect people to learn AI. Refusing to build any muscle with these tools is becoming its own professional risk.The problem starts when “AI-first” becomes a test of seriousness. Once the expected answer is visible, people learn to produce that answer. They mention the tool in planning. They add it to the workflow where it can be seen. They show the demo. They write the performance-review paragraph. The company gets evidence of adoption before it gets evidence that the work…

No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.