A.I. and Liability 0 ▲ Pixel Envy 2 hours ago · Tech · hide · 0 comments Bruce Schneier: AI agents are agents of the person or organization that deploys them—and should be treated by the law as such. If a company hired human writers to write its summaries, that company would be liable for inaccuracies in those summaries. If a company’s human agent signed contracts in the company’s name, that company would be bound by those contracts. And if a doctor gave dangerously wrong medical advice, they would be liable for malpractice. To allow businesses to hide behind the excuse of faulty AI in those same circumstances would be a massive handout to companies, and would introduce disastrous incentives for corporate misbehavior. Why hire human writers, lawyers or doctors when AIs are not only cheaper, but also absolve employers whenever they make a mistake? In his video essay nominally about artificial intelligence, economist Cahal Moran repeatedly references the book “The Unaccountability Machine” by Dan Davies. I am only a couple of chapters in, but I think I am… No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.