1 hour ago · 8 min read1603 words · Tech · 0 comments

Multiple free software (or open source) projects have policies that forbid, or in some cases allow with extra scrutiny and scepticism, contributions that are supported by AI-augmented tools. I believe that this is a poor decision for many reasons, which fall under these categories: The Four Freedoms Free Software and Copyright Freedom to Fork Historical Discontinuities Unintended Consequences Miscategorized Assumptions I will present my argument on each point, then conclude by saying the policy I believe that these projects would be better served with. This is just my suggestion, of course, I’m not in a leadership position on any of the projects and I’ve only contributed to them in minor ways. 1. The Four Freedoms. Central to the philosophy of free software – and transitively to the open source philosophy – are the four freedoms. The GNU project website spells them out in full, but I like the pithy summary from FSF Europe: ‘use, study, share, improve’. Given these freedoms as…

No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.