Every measurement shortcut follows a recognizable sequence. First comes the exciting phase: a new tool produces results at a scale and speed impossible with previous methods. Papers accumulate. Discoveries multiply. Funding follows. Careers are built on throughput. The shortcut becomes normal before its failure modes are fully understood. Then comes the reckoning. Not a scandal — something quieter and more expensive. The field begins to notice that some findings do not survive contact with physical ground truth. The categories were never perfectly separable: results that reflect biological reality and results that reflect the model’s statistical regularities. By the time that becomes obvious, the investments have already been made. The urgent question is no longer whether the tool is impressive. It is which findings are real. Spatial proteomics is in the exciting phase. What follows is an attempt to describe its shape, its likely successor, and the validation infrastructure it has not…
No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.