AI has made generating plausible output incredibly fast and easy. Words, code, images, presentations, analyses — ask for something and the machine will produce it right now. What AI has not made fast and easy is judgment. The people who will get the most value from AI are not the best prompters. They’ll be the ones who can critically engage with what comes back, recognizing when it’s wrong, when it’s shallow, when it’s synthetic, and when it can be improved. I’ve spent the last year using AI heavily in my professional work, and here and there on this blog. I came to AI with good judgment built over decades as a writer and engineering leader. If anything, using AI has deepened and sharpened my judgment. Where judgment comes from Conventional wisdom says that judgment comes from years of making your own mistakes. The software developer who debugs their own bad code until the lesson is internalized. The writer who rewrites their own bad drafts until they develop an eye for what isn’t…
No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.