I found I had so much to say about Emily Segal's latest Nemesis Memos post, that I not only transferred it from Thought Shrapnel to here, but I think this is going to have to be a couple of posts. Segal is talking about the world of aesthetics as it relates to AI, but it's absolutely relevant to the world of digital literacies. Taste is not really a property of various objects. It is a socially validated relation between objects, people, histories, scenes, and timing.If we swap “Digital literacy” for “Taste” then it's a socially-negotiated relation between people, tools, practices, contexts, and communities. Segal discusses the ways in which AI-generated designs look almost right, but feel a bit hollow. The uncanny valley is produced by AI knowing what the visible signs of taste should be (e.g. a Dieter Rams book on a shelf) but they're extracted from the social relations that give them meaning, and redeployed generically.I would say the biggest thing people are missing about taste…
No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.