I don’t generally like to write about the same topic twice in a row, but 2 days after I posted my gerrymandering post, the Supreme Court completely contradicted something I said. To quote myself: "In essence, [Rucho vs. Common Cause] protects the ability of a state to draw lines how it wishes outside of a few fringe cases" (Emphasis added) That fringe case I was referring to was race due to the Voting Rights Act, which has been weakened by the SCOTUS in the decision Louisiana v. Callais from just a few days ago. Please note: While I have done my best to be as accurate as possible, this is still only my opinion and I am viewing this from a progressive perspective. Background on the caseLouisiana’s congressional map has six districts due to its population. In 2022, the district maps were challenged on the grounds that, while a third of Louisianans were black, only one district had a majority of Black voters. This meant that, come election time, black votes would be crowded out against…
No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.