I saw a few papers on arXiv recently that were very clearly prepared by asking ChatGPT or some other GenAI to analyse an idea and write a paper. Of course, the papers contained obvious mistakes, but obvious to whom? It is very well-known to experts on any topic who interacted with GenAI that one of the reasons they are so terrible is their need to appease the user. This is such a wonderful question you're asking!, and its fellow responses. We all know that although most of the questions stud...
No comments yet. Log in to discuss on the Fediverse