Consider the accepted social ranking of who is how much of an intellectual. Think of this ranking as made by a weighted average of the opinions of other intellectuals. If we look at how this weighting changes across intellectual levels, there will be a median level, where half of the weight comes from opinions above that level, and half from below. I asked ChatGPT (5.5) and Claude (4.7) to give percentile estimates for the median level who judges who are the very best intellectuals, for the West in various years. They gave median 99%,99.5% for year 1000, median 96%,97% for year 1750, median 93%,90% for 1900, and median 88%,80% for 2025. We have thus seen increasing populism is who among us judges who are our very best intellectuals. Which is plausibly a source of intellectual decay. Especially as it is usually noted that we usually find it hard to distinguish between mental quality levels above our own level.
No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.