[Note: I have other NetChoice rulings and segregate-and-suppress opinions stuck in my blog queue. I hope to cover them eventually. I’m fast-tracking this one because it rejects some noxious yet popular forms of Internet suppression. Also, check out this line from the opinion: “Arkansas cannot sentence speech on the internet to death by a thousand cuts.” To be fair, most legislators would choose to sentence Internet speech to death in one swift, decisive blow if they could.] * * * This case involves NetChoice’s Constitutional challenge to Arkansas Act 900 of 2025, one of many Internet censorship laws coming out of Arkansas. I previously blogged about the injunctions against Act 689, the so-called Social Media Safety Act and Act 901. Does the Arkansas legislature do anything other than pass unconstitutional Internet censorship laws? Act 900 tries to revive Act 689 by amending it after it was enjoined. Not surprisingly, the amendment doesn’t go well. The court preliminarily enjoins Act…
No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.