38 days ago · 0 comments

There's a concept that tends to make people visibly uncomfortable the moment it comes up in conversation: the social credit score. Most of us associate it with China - a surveillance-heavy system that rewards compliant citizens and penalizes troublemakers. The reaction in the West is almost reflexive: dystopian, Orwellian, deeply wrong. And yet. Here's the uncomfortable part. We already live inside a scoring system. We just didn't vote for it, can't see it, and have absolutely no say in how it's used. Every search query, every click, every purchase and pause and scroll feeds into profiles that Google, Meta, Amazon, and Apple have been building about us for years. The data exists. The social graph exists. The difference is that it belongs to them, not to us - and it's used not to protect us, but to sell to us, manipulate us, predict us. So my provocation is this: what if the problem with social scoring isn't the concept itself, but who controls it, and for what purpose? I'd like to…

No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.