1 day ago · Writing · 0 comments

If you know what BookTok is, you're probably sick of the discourse that surrounds it every month. But yesterday, I started (and didn't finish) a YouTube video from about a year ago. The creator in the video was discussing two videos that went viral on BookTok in which BookTok reviewers admitted to skipping descriptive paragraphs (essentially just reading the dialogue) and even complaining about the amount of words on the pages of the books they read. ...So why are they reading? On that point, I don't really care. What I do care about, however, is that someone can't review a book if they didn't read/listen to all the words in it. Yes, you can review a book you didn't finish, but that is not what I am attacking. I know some people skip introductions, prologues, and epilogues; none of that is new to me (I used to do it myself). But if you're skipping entire chunks of text throughout a book... (!!!???) No, you cannot give a review of it and claim that you finished it. I think if you can't…

No comments yet. Log in to reply on the Fediverse. Comments will appear here.